Chapter 3
American Federalism
Chapter Outline
I. Introduction
A. Federalism
is the constitutional division of powers between the national government and
the
states
B. Federalism
issues are at the top of the political agenda along with the issue of
devolution.
C. Since the
New Deal in the 1930s to today, there has been a shift of power from the states
to
the national government; since 1994
elections there has been an attempt to
return power to the
states as exemplified by the Educational
Flexibility Partnership Demonstration Act of 1999
D. Issues of
federalism are found today in Canada (Quebec), the former Soviet Union, the United
Kingdom (Scotland and Wales), and so
forth.
E. Supreme
Court’s recent record on federalism has been “mixed.”
F. Federalism
debates depend upon issue at stake and rival philosophies of national action
vs.
decentralization.
II. Defining
federalism (one scholar has counted 267 definitions)
A.
Constitutionally-divided powers between national and constituent (state)
governments
1. Distribution of powers cannot be
changed by ordinary laws
2. Both governmental levels operate through
own agents and exercise power directly over
individuals (both levels derive powers
from constitution)
3. Dual, Marble cake, competitive,
permissive, and new varieties of federalism
4. Canada, Switzerland, Mexico, Australia
have federal systems (nearly 40 percent of global
population live in federally-organized
nations); Only 21 of 185 nation-states claim to be federal
polities.
5. U.S. is a nation of about 85,000
governmental units
B. Alternatives
to federalism
1. Unitary systems place all governmental
power in central government (Britain, France, Israel)
2. Confederation allows central government
to make regulations for constituent governments
(European Union is a contemporary
example; Articles of Confederation is a past one)
C. Why
federalism?
1. Federalism checks the growth of tyranny
a. Inhibits formation of a
single-interest majority
2. Federalism allows unity without
uniformity
a. No need for consensus on every
divisive issue
3. Federalism encourages experimentation
a. States are "laboratories"
for public policy experimentation
b. States have been in the forefront
on health care, voting, air pollution control programs
4. Federalism keeps government closer to
the people
a. Provides numerous arenas for
decision-making
b. Local and state politics involve
citizens in large numbers
III. The
constitutional structure of American federalism
A. Powers of
the national government
1. Express, implied, and inherent powers
2. Four constitutional pillars that permit
expansion of central government functions
a. National Supremacy Article binds all
public officials to support the Constitution
b. The War Power: the national
government has the power to wage war
c. The power to regulate interstate and
foreign commerce through the commerce clause,
Congress can regulate many
activities and sustain other legislation as well
d. The power to tax and spend by
attaching conditions to its grants of money, Congress
may regulate what it cannot
directly control by law
B. Powers of
the states
1. States have reserved powers: the Constitution reserves for the states all
powers not granted
to the national government, subject
only to the limitations of the Constitution
2. Each state has concurrent powers with
the national government
C.
Constitutional limits and obligations
1. States' prohibitions
a. Cannot make treaties with foreign
nations
b. Cannot authorize private parties to
engage in piracy
c. Cannot coin money
2. States' prohibitions without
congressional consent
a. Cannot tax imports, exports, or
foreign ships
b. Cannot keep troops or ships in
peacetime (except the National Guard)
c. Cannot enter into compacts with
other states or foreign nations which infringe upon
national supremacy
d. Cannot engage in war, unless invaded
or in imminent danger
3. National government cannot use powers to
interfere with state responsibilities
a. National government must guarantee
to each state a republican form of government
b. National government must protect
states against domestic insurrection
c. Note unfunded mandates and states’
sovereign immunity cases
D. Interstate
Relations
1. Full faith and credit (note insert on
same-sex marriages)
a. Clause requires each state court to
accept civil judgments and public records of other state
courts (Article IV, Section 1)
2. Interstate privileges and immunities
(Article IV, Section 2)
a. States must extend to citizens of
other states the privileges and immunities granted to their
own citizens
b. States may not impose unreasonable
residency requirements
3. Extradition (Article IV, Section 2)
a. Fugitives must be returned by the
governor to the state from which they fled (some exceptions)
4. Interstate compacts
a. Establishes interstate agencies to
resolve interstate problems (must be approved by Congress)
5. Note “Federalism in Comparative
Perspective” Insert—Canada, Germany, and Switzerland
IV. The role of the
federal courts: umpires of federalism
A. McCulloch v. Maryland
1. John Marshall established the doctrines
of implied national power and national supremacy
2. McCulloch
v. Maryland was significant in providing support for nationalism
B. Federal
courts and the role of the states
1. Actions by state and local officials can
be challenged before a federal judge
2. Preemption—federal laws take precedence
over state and local laws (civil rights, water quality)
3. Supreme Court has generally favored
powers of federal government over the states
C. The great
debate: centralists versus decentralists
1. The decentralist position
a. The national government is nothing
more than an agent of the states, and every one of its
powers should be narrowly defined
b. The Tenth Amendment prohibits the
national government from using delegated powers to
interfere with activities reserved
for the states
2. The centralist position
a. The Constitution is a supreme law
established by the people; it was intended that the
central government's powers be
liberally defined
b. The national government is a
government of all the people, and each state speaks for only
some of the people
D. The Supreme
Court and the Role of Congress
1. The centralist position has had the
Supreme Court's constitutional endorsement throughout
most of history, but recently the Court
has veered back to a more decentralist position
a. Note ruling on imposition of term
limits—Stevens vs. Thomas
b.
Note that Congress may no longer authorize individuals to bring legal actions
against states
in
order to force compliance with federal law in either federal or state courts
2. Court’s “constitutional counterrevolution”—striking
down of Violence Against Women Act,
on grounds that Congress had exceeded
its powers and intruded on the powers of the states
3. Court increasingly split along
ideological lines with conservatives favoring states’ rights
and liberals resisting that
interpretation (Souter, Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer)
V. Regulatory
Federalism, Federal Grants, and Federal Mandates
A. Goals of
federal grants
1. To supply revenue to state and local
governments
2. To establish minimum national standards
3. To equalize resources among the states
4. To attack national problems, yet
minimize the growth of federal agencies
B. Types of
federal grants
1. Categorical-formula grants
a. Congress appropriates funds for
specific purposes
b. Funds are subject to detailed
federal conditions
2. Project grants
a. Congress appropriates a certain sum,
which is allocated to state and local units based on
applications
3. Block grants
a. Allocated to states for prescribed
activities with few federal restrictions
C. The politics
of federal grants
1. Arguments about what constitutes
desirable public policy, where power should be located,
and who will gain or lose by the
various types of grants
2. Iron triangles or issue networks:
interest groups, congressional committees, and federal
bureaucrats form forces and are
effective in protecting programs
3. Republicans favor less federal
supervision and the delegation of spending discretion to the
state and local governments; Democrats
favor detailed federally supervised spending
4. The Republicans made one major change in
federal-state relations by ending Aid to Families
with Dependent Children (AFDC); Republican
conservatives insisted on some federal
restrictions
5. The battle over the appropriate level of
government to control the funds tends to be cyclical
D. Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
1. This act calls for issuing reports on
the impact of unfunded mandates, providing judicially
enforceable cost-benefit analyses of
mandates and regulations, and consulting state and local
officials prior to the issuance of
regulations; still, has not slowed down mandates appreciably
2. The act imposes constraints on Congress
itself; increases congressional awareness of mandates
E. New
techniques of federal control (insert)
1. Direct orders: compliance under threat
of criminal or civil sanction (EEOA-1972)
2. Cross-cutting requirements: conditions
on one grant extended to all federally-supported
activities (Title VI of the 1964 Civil
Rights Act)
3. Cross-over sanctions: permit the use of
federal dollars in one program to influence state and
local policy in another (federal
highway aid and minimum drinking age of 21)
4. Total preemption: national government preempts under the
supremacy and commerce clauses
5. Partial preemption: federal law establishes basic policies but
requires states to administer
them (Clean Air Act of 1990 example of
mandatory partial preemption)
VI. The politics of
federalism
A. The growth
of big government
1. Power has shifted from social
institutions to the national government
2. Reasons for this shift in power
a. Many problems have become national
in scope
b. With industrialization, powerful
interests made demands on the national government
c. Peoples' attitudes toward national
government changed with the growth of the national
economy and the creation of a national transportation and
communications network
d. Economic and social conditions
created pressures for expansion of the national government
e.
Political leaders, federal judges, and federal administrators promoted
federal initiatives
3. The politics of federalism are changing,
and Congress is pressured to reduce the size and
scope of national programs
a.
Tax laws no longer permit automatic increases to compensate for
inflation, so Congress
faces reduced federal revenues
b.
The cost of entitlement programs is going up, so it is tempting for
Congress to turn over
the problems to the states by
using block grants
B. The
devolution revolution: a revolution or just rhetoric?
1. In the 104th Congress, there was a
dramatic shift in responsibilities from the national
government back to the states; however,
Congress also increased the authority of the national
government in many areas, so the
revolution may have “fizzled”
VII. The future of
federalism
A. Debate over
federalism has three levels
1. Which government can most effectively
deal with a particular problem?
2. Where can groups best be heard?
3. Which is the best way to protect liberty
and promote equality?
B. The
reemergence of the states
1. Shift of programs to states meant huge
growth of state governments and greater state
expenditures
C. The future
of federalism
1. States are stronger than ever (expanded
roles, perhaps more favorable to minorities);
2. Business interests complain that
conflicting state regulations burden interstate commerce
(note states joining suit against
Microsoft)
3. Federal system remains rooted in
constitutional system—not likely that national government
will retreat to a pre-1930 or pre-1960 posture—new issues
demand federal
action such as the global economy, the information
explosion, and technology
4. Americans strongly attached to federal system—are pragmatists who use
the level of
government necessary to meet new needs and challenges