|
1
|
- Bill of Rights was ratified after the signing of the Constitution in
1791
- Selective incorporation- Gitlow v. New York (1925) protected freedom of
speech from abridgment by the state/local government
- Today, only exceptions are Amendments 2,3,7, 10, and grand jury
requirements of the Fifth Amendment
- The History of the Court
|
|
2
|
- The establishment clause prohibits the establishment of a state religion
- Created a strict separation of church and state Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
- Lemon test:
- 1 Endorsement test
- 2. Nonpreferential test
- 3. Strict separation
|
|
3
|
- What the establishment clause forbids schools cannot encourage or
sponsor
- Prayer in public schools may not be endorsed by school authorities
- Prayer in school is legal
- Parochial school aid- Lemon test, aid must have a secular purpose, Tax
funds cannot be used in religious schools to pay teachers
|
|
4
|
- The Free exercise clause
- Right to hold any or no religious belief is one of our few absolute
rights
- The “free exercise” clause does not allow discrimination on a religious
belief systems rather than adherence to a formal creed
|
|
5
|
- Today the Supreme Court holds that only four narrow categories of
speech-libel, obscenity, fighting words, and commercial speech-are
nonprotected speech
- How we prove libel, how we define obscenity, how we determine which
words are fighting words, and how much commercial speech may be
regulated remain hotly contested issues.
|
|
6
|
- “Freedom of Speech” most controversial freedom
- The clear and present danger test- yelling “fire” in a crowed theater
- Hate-speech codes at a university
- Insulting racial remarks in public
- Insulting sexual remarks in public
|
|
7
|
- Libel-written
- Sedition Act of 1789- speak critically about Congress or the President
- Led to a popular reaction against the Federalists
- Seditious speech, if narrowly defined to cover only the advocacy of
immediate and concrete acts of violence, is not constitutionally
protected
- New York Times v. Sullivan –public persons (actual malice),"
statements were made with a knowing or reckless disregard for the
truth”-private persons without proving actual malice
- Obscenity not entitled to constitutional protection
|